Posted by: Kristen Ridley | February 22, 2011

LinkedIn and Facebook and Twitter – Oh My!

I am part of the generation who came just BEFORE the Gen Y’s and Millenials, so the social media revolution was a bit of an adjustment for me initially.

I had some issues initially with the idea of interacting with people only through a device, instead of face-to-face, which was the predominant – the only other one was on the – gasp! – telephone!! – mode for my formative years. I managed to get the hang of email pretty well, and thought I was fairly accomplished with it. Well, after all by that time I was a communicator professionally, and written words were the tool of my trade, so I would HOPE I would be able to write a coherent, effective email!

But then as it tends to do, the world shifted on its axis, and my sister – my younger sister, I should point out – started urging me to create a page on this newfangled thing called “Facebook“. “Ugh!” I thought, “Why would I want anything to do with that?!” However, when my sister bribed me with: “You know if you joined, I could send you pictures of the girls more often.” By “the girls” she meant my two nieces, who are the sunshine of my life, and who, because they live about 4 hours away from where I live, I don’t get to see as often as I’d like. Darn! Once she said that, it was really just a matter of time before I created a Facebook page.

And, truthfully, I got hooked on Facebook pretty quickly and easily. Again, not that surprising, given that most of the communicators I know are very social and gregarious individuals, and Facebook is a pretty social application, making it very easy to connect with people you want to connect with. So again, I felt quite smug about being one of the first people in my social circle to have a Facebook page, which, admittedly includes lots of people who are NOT communicators, and therefore have no need to be on social media tools.

And then, along came “LinkedIn“. “Oh great! Here we go again, I thought.” Although because LinkedIn is designed to be a business-focused, professional social media site, it was a fair bit easier to understand, navigate and participate on for me. I was able to not only stay connected to current business partners and colleagues, but I could also re-connect with colleagues I’d lost touch with from past jobs. There are some definite advantages to the new online world! LinkedIn also lets me keep up-to-date with what’s going on in the professional lives of my contacts. I like knowing when somone’s gotten a new job or a promotion, or has completed a big project so I can send a message of congratulations! Those are the little things that help me truly stay connected with my contacts, and that I simply wasn’t able to do before LinkedIn came along.

So, another “new world” hurdle scaled successfully, and I was, once again feeling pleased with myself. Of course, given the speed the world’s been changing at, that feeling lasted about 20 minutes!

Because THEN, there was Twitter. Dum, dum, dum!

Oh, good GRIEF, Charlie Brown!! Twitter?! My initial reaction was: “You have GOT to be kidding me, right??” I mean, when I heard about the 140 character – characters, not even words!?! – limit, I thought: “Yeah, that’s not gonna work for me at all.”

I also had some difficulty understanding the point of Twitter at the beginning. I mean, how much interacting can you DO with only 140 characters???

But, ultimately, I felt like I had to get on there, because I AM a communicator, and Twitter IS a communication tool. It’s my job to be able to advise my employer about what communication tools are out there, and if/how we need to use those tools to advance the strategic objectives of our organization in the most effective ways. How can I do that if I haven’t even participated in all those tools?? Well, duh! I can’t.

So, grumbling and kvetching the whole way, off I went to create a Twitter page. I had a much harder time “getting” Twitter than any of the other social media tools. At first I just didn’t see the value in it. It appeared to be a random, often irrelevant – to me, anyway – list of comments. It seemed a lot like being at a party or networking event, where you wander from conversation to conversation, only getting snippets of discussions without actually getting anything out of any of them. I really didn’t enjoy Twitter in the beginning.

But, as time passed, and I asked some of my contacts from other parts of my world who were also on Twitter what they got out of it, and how I could get something more out of it, I finally started to dig a little deeper and find the value in the tool.

But, here’s the thing: I’ve realized, now that I’ve been on these social media sites for a while now that I use each of the three tools very differently. So, I thought I’d share how I approach each of these sites, and then, if you’d care to, I’d love to hear how YOU use these tools.

LinkedIn
LinkedIn tells you right on the”About” page that it “operates the world’s largest professional network”, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that I use it as a business and professional opportunity to connect. In fact, LinkedIn goes to great lengths to advise users to only connect with people they know, so that reinforces the intention of the site, and what it wants to be.

So on my LinkedIn profile, I’m the strictly business “me”. I post things about my job that I think might be of interest to my contacts, such as interesting or challenging communication projects I or my company are working on, or new communication resources or people who I’ve discovered that might be helpful to my fellow communicators. And, while I like to think that I use my sense of humour to enhance the information and updates I share here, I generally keep the goofy side of “me” off my LinkedIn page. I save that stuff for Facebook

Facebook
Perhaps it’s because of how and why I was introduced to Facebook – by my sister, bribing me with more frequent updates on my nieces, you’ll recall – or the fact that at the time I joined not many of my friends and family were on it, I made a decision early on that my Facebook page would be a private place where I could be completely myself, say whatever silly or opinionated things I wanted to, and post pictures I’ve taken of things I enjoy – like gardens or architecture of my visits home to see the family – that probably wouldn’t be appropriate, or, frankly, of much interest to the people I’m connected to on LinkedIn.

As a result of that decision, I’ve set everything on my Facebook page to “Friends Only”, which means the only way you can see anything about me or my page is to send me a friend request and have me accept it. And, unlike the majority of people on Facebook, I ONLY accept friends who really ARE my friends. People I actually know, and want to regularly interact with in a personally connected way. That means that I have a – to most people – horrifyingly small number of Facebook friends. A total of just 63 friends, in fact.

But I’m completely content with that, because it means that I can uninhibitedly be the goof that – truth be told – I sometimes AM in my personal life without having to worry about it offending someone, negatively affecting career prospects or affecting my professional relationships. Not because I think there’s anything wrong with the things I say or do. In fact, I believe strongly in respect as a basic human right and I try hard to give it to everyone I interact with, even when I go off on a political or social issue rant on Facebook. When I HAVE a strong opinion on something though, I feel I should be able to express it without having to worry about whether I’ll offend someone unintentionally. The people I’m connected with on Facebook know me [at least, I believe they do] so they know that while I have some hot button issues I feel and speak strongly about, I’m basically a pretty decent human being, who’s kind to children and animals, loves coffee and books, and is devoted to the point of idiocy to my sweet nieces. These people don’t get offended by my opinions, although they certainly will sometimes disagree and debate with me on those opinions, and that’s perfectly fine – because that’s what friends do! So for me, there’s a clear and firm line between “professional” me and “personal” me and it works for me.

Now, Shel Holtz, as those of you who are communicators already know, is an expert and highly respected authority on social media, has a different perspective on this. I read and subscribe to Shel’s blog, because he’s smart, and he has his finger on the pulse of all things social media so if you’re interested in the topic at all, you should be reading his stuff too! But Shel has said in many posts, including the recent: “There’s nobody here but me“, that “It’s impossible to separate your work life from your personal life.” And while I wouldn’t dream of contradicting Shel on anything related to social media, for me, having that separation works. It possibly works because I have such a small number of trusted friends, who are unlikely to “out” me by copying and pasting [which of course is possible] something silly I might post on Facebook in some other, more public place. Regardless of why it works, it works – again, let me stress: for me – and as long as it works I’ll keep that separation.

Twitter
And then there’s Twitter. For me, Twitter, and my use of it falls somewhere in between the approach I have to LinkedIn and Facebook. I definitely use Twitter to connect with and interact with business colleagues and people I already know, and who have intelligent, interesting and funny things to say – like Steve Crescenzo, Colleen Hawk, and Susan Cellura, all of whom helped me get a handle on Twitter in the early days. But, unlike LinkedIn, I can also follow people I didn’t necessarily know before but WANT TO! People I admire and respect – like Shel, Geoff Livingston, or Donna Papacosta. Plus, I’ve made new friends on Twitter – people who’ve either helped me get more out of Twitter, like Judy Gombita, or younger people who help me see the world from a different perspective, like Stephanie Johnson. I can even follow “famous” people [although I don’t do much of that] like the Dalai Lama! And just as a “by the by”, if the Dalai Lama’s on Twitter, well, that’s a good enough endorsement for ME to give it a whirl!

Aside from the variety of people I can interact with on Twitter, the very thing that made it seem overwhelming at first has become one of the things I most enjoy a year or so in – the constant flow of Tweets. Depending on the number and variety of people you follow, in any given hour you may see: news updates, links to other people’s blog posts, pictures of someone’s vacation or new baby, professional development events or news, book reviews, silly opinions on Lindsay Lohan’s latest peccadillo, or RT’s [re-tweets] of something YOU have tweeted that someone else found valuable enough to share with THEIR contacts [that’s VERY COOL when it happens!]. Once you get used to the continuous scroll of information [some people tweet a lot, others not so much] and learn to identify what Tweets are of interest to you and which ones are just today’s extraneous noise [because every day is different – today’s noise might be tomorrow’s critical info], you can find extremely helpful, interesting, enjoyable information on Twitter – and there’s a LOT of it!

The final thing that Twitter has given me is something every communicator can benefit from – I’ve gotten much better at editing myself! Because Twitter only gives you 140 characters to speak your piece, you HAVE to learn how to say what’s on your mind succinctly, clearly and in an engaging way within that limit – and if you want to include a link to something in your tweet, you have to keep your words even shorter! At first, I must confess that I found the limit very frustrating and I gave up on many tweets I wanted to send because I couldn’t say them in under 140 characters and still get my point across using English [I rarely use “texting slang”]. But with practice, and with seeing how other people managed to communicate effectively on Twitter, I got better at it. Now, I look at it as a challenge, and a way to keep my communication skills sharp, and current while still interacting in my own unique voice. I actually find I kind of like communicating in a totally different manner than the way I typically interact at work, i.e. emails, PowerPoint presentations, intranet articles, etc. Dare I say it? Twitter’s sort of fun!

Well, that’s how I use these social media sites. How about you? Do you have different ways to use these sites, or are they all the same in terms of what you do with them, how you benefit from their features, and who you connect with? I really would love to hear how others – especially other communicators – use these various tools. Please weigh in! Thanks.


Responses

  1. Nice post, Kristen. I use these tools in a very similar way, although I think I am closer to Shel’s stance on how “personal” my FB updates are. (Of course I muddied the waters for myself when I added a Facebook BUSINESS page. Oy.)

    It’s nice to be friends with you on all these platforms, by the way. I always enjoy your opinions.

  2. Thanks for commenting Donna! I think that anyone who’s a business owner probably uses the tools in similar ways, since when you are running a business you want people to be able to find you – presumably hire you! – in as many places as possible.

    That’s something I hadn’t considered, having never been a business owner myself, but I think it’s a good point to add to this discussion.

  3. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephanie Johnson , Kristen Ridley. Kristen Ridley said: Do you use Twitter the same way you use Facebook & LinkedIn? Would love you to weigh in on my post on the topic: http://tinyurl.com/4jyefkr […]

  4. I have loose rules of thumb that work for me, though I am not slavish about them.

    Also, any one person can fall into one, two or all three groups.

    LinkedIn: Business people I have or would like to meet in a meeting room or a conference. I have done business with them, or would like to — “business” being loosely defined as some sort of professional relationship (hanging out at the same conference, for example). Whether I have met them or not does not matter, as long as we have mutual friends whose judgment I trust, or I know their reputation.

    Because LinkedIn is reciprocal, a relationship, if only of respect, is implied.

    Facebook: People I would invite home for dinner. People I call and say hi to if I am in their town a few days. Here again, both sides are acknowledging a relationship.

    Twitter: I follow those who inform, entertain and inspire me. I follow an Anglican bishop, George Carlin’s erudite daughter, fellow innkeepers, IABCers, an activist for the homeless, excellent cooks, politicians whom I detest, a whole rag-bag of folks. 99% I wouldn’t recognize if they walked through the door.

    All that said, I am fairly messy about all this. I am woefully behind on LinkedIn adds… I post too much business stuff on Facebook. Post too much stuff on Twitter that is better suited to both LinkedIn and FB.

    So, these are my “guidelines” only.

  5. Thanks for weighing in Allan!

    Your comment seems to validate what I have sensed in talking with others on this topic over the past couple of years – that we’re all sort of going with the flow on how we want to use various social media tools, making up our own “rules” as we go along, and revising those rules as circumstances seem to dictate in the situation.

    Given how new most of these tools – and the situations in which we utilize them – are for many of us, I think that being flexible with them makes the most sense. It will be interesting to look back on this topic in 3 or 4 years from now and see if the approaches people take to the tools have solidified, or whether they remain fluid and changeable.

  6. Kristen,

    Following is a tonne of “weigh-in” from me!

    Twitter
    Thank you for indicating that I helped you “to get more out of Twitter.” I think out of the three social media platforms you’ve described (very well) that Twitter is indeed the most akin to going to a networking event and conversing with a wide variety of people—some at length, others for a few minutes. Some you will “grow” your relationship, others you may never meet up with or talk to again. Most you will like more and more (as you get to know them), some you may actually become less impressed by (“familiarity breeds contempt”). And all of these things are OK.

    Interestingly, one of my two submissions to Aussie Craig Pearce’s upcoming e-report, “Public relations 2011: issues, insights and ideas,” is called “PR primer for (social) networking,” whereby I detail how your in-person networking can or should be replicated in social media. I really believe the most successful Twitter interactions are ones that most closely resemble the way you interact in real life, including being open to meeting new people (on an egalitarian basis) and tempering one’s discussions and opinions (because it IS a public and searchable platform). The trendy phrase is “to be authentic to your personal brand,” but in a recent #brandchat discussion I offered up that’s a personal brand really is more akin to a mashup of your reputation and personality. (Now that we’ve met, talked and spent quality one-on-one time in person, I can say that I think YOUR Twitter personal brand is very representative of your offline one.)

    More than a year ago I was asked to write a guest post (about my thoughts on Foursquare and Twitter), where I took the opportunity to indicate what I wanted to get out of Twitter. I’m still satisfied with it:

    “My account is a personal one. My main incentives and goals are to widen my (international) network, source and exchange information, monitor trends (in the public relations, communication management and social media industries), and to debate ideas and events, particularly those related to current affairs. My secondary incentive and goals are to be amused…and (hopefully) to amuse.”

    Facebook
    Now I can’t speak overly much to Facebook, as I never did set up an account. I can tell you that at “The People Web” session at Social Media Week Toronto (hosted by Facebook), the speaker (Steve Irvine) indicated that studies have shown that the average person has (only) SIX PEOPLE (friends or family) that they refer to on a regular basis to make major decisions. Ergo, if you have 63 true friends on Facebook, rather than being “horrifyingly small,” it’s probably a much more truthful number and maybe even above the norm. (Following the release of the Edelman Trust Barometer 2011 whereby social media fell to the bottom of the trust scale, there was some online commentary about the fact that perhaps we “trusted” social media less simply because the concept of “friends” had been debased on Facebook, etc.)

    LinkedIn
    One correction to your post: LinkedIn preceded Facebook, rather than vice versa. I know this because I was in the beta group (coming on 11 years). One of the very first people to be in the alpha group was John Carson. He invited my dear friend and colleague, Kathryn Boothby (whom I met through volunteer work with IABC/Toronto), to join his original LinkedIn network. And she asked me to be in hers. The lovely serendipity is that John Carson and I are now connected on both Twitter and LinkedIn. And he’s proven to be as great as Kathryn told me he is, in terms of being an information resource and collegiality.

    Besides the way you described LinkedIn, for me it really has proven to be a great resource (and depository) for my international network. Some of my network derives from past employment or volunteer work colleagues. Some of the people I met originally on listservs (run by Ragan or, in particular, Melcrum). Others I’ve “met” through their blogs or Twitter. And others I’ve got to know and/or respect through arts or NGO operations, etc., both off and online. The basis for giving or accepting a LinkedIn invitation is the feeling that we each have something to offer to the other, in some capacity. Part of this (now) is by monitoring one another’s updates, which you’ve indicated above.

    Networking ecosystem
    Regarding social media, currently the most frequent route I’m finding to increasing my network is as follows:

    Twitter and blog reading  LinkedIn and/or email connections  in-person or telephone “meetings.”

    That’s the route we took, isn’t it? (Twitter, LinkedIn, in-person) And in our case the first (but not last) meeting was because you attended the #VXToronto Tweetup event, which I helped to organize at the invitation of my Californian Twitter/LinkedIn mate, Neal Schaffer.

    I’m so glad you agreed to come to the tweetup, on a number of levels. Best of all, I’m delighted that you had such a great time—because it had to be scary, coming to an event where you had not physically “met” a single person before.

    In some ways social media is a leap of faith. But I believe the potential of enhanced networking outcomes is usually worth any risk. As you are doing, simply THINK about where and how to interact.

    Happy (social) networking!

    Judy

    P.S. Some links:

    http://craigpearce.info/ and http://twitter.com/commaim

  7. Judy – Thank you so much for your extremely comprehensive and thoughtful comment [of course, having met you, I’d expect nothing less!]

    A few thoughts on yours:

    1) Thank you for saying that my online and live personalities match up. That is always my intent. I feel authenticity is a very important component of any relationship I enter into, regardless of whether it is in the online world or the “real” one, perhaps because true authenticity is rather a rarity in the current “PR-managed” world we seem to have created for ourselves. Whether it be politicians, CEOs, or even [based on info from friends who are parents] the interactions between teachers and parents it seems that nobody feels safe saying what they really think without first vetting it through PR-agencies, focus-groups or friends. I think that’s a shame, because we all know when we’re being “managed” and generally we don’t like it, even if – to be honest – we aren’t always completely fair in our reactions to those courageous few who ARE authentic and honest.

    Speaking strictly for myself, I don’t know any other way to be but completely, authentically myself. On the few occasions when I’ve tried intentionally to “be” something or someone not natural to me, it’s been a rather failed experiment. So now “I yam who I yam” as Popeye likes to say, and I just live with whatever results that generates as best I’m able. Usually, it works out okay!

    2) When I referred to LinkedIn coming after Facebook, I meant as a tool that I adopted, and not as a reference to which tool was actually available first. Apologies if that was misleading – it was unintentional.

    3) As to our initial “in-person” meeting, I felt a lot more sanguine coming to an event without “knowing” anyone yet, because I knew that you would be there. Our interactions on Twitter really did allow me to get enough of a sense of you that I felt very confident I would be glad I came – and I was, and still am today!

    Thanks again for your thoughts Judy.


I'd love to hear what YOU think! Please share.

Categories